Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

everything about recording techniques, software, hardware etc...

Moderators: greatmutah, GuitarBilly

Post Reply
User avatar
Markdude
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:46 pm

Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Markdude »

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i770M9pM0_k&index=153&list=PLBF1E907BF2A26291[/video]

Pete Thorn did a really informative video about recording guitars via tube amps into load boxes into IRs. My favorite part is at 16:07 when he compares the tonal change between different load boxes. It shows how much of a difference there really is between resistive and reactive loads.
VTM
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 15536
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by VTM »

Before watching this vid I never thought about reactive vs resistive load boxes. Thanks for posting.
Cameron Amps wrote:He's right....I think VTMs sound great....go get one. No nos tubes needed.

TurboPablo wrote:Scribble strips are for kids.
User avatar
Tortuga
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 17174
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:29 am
Location: Slow and steady, bruh

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Tortuga »

Awesome video. Amazing difference between various load boxes, for sure. Did I miss a part where he stated the actual load he used when playing back his recorded IR?
Co-founder of the Jet Setters 2.0 (Jet ★ City Lounge Redux)

Gear
  • CEOwLP (Sig T), Carvin DC135, Westone Spectrum SX (guitar) & GT (bass), Squier strat
  • '66 Bassman, '61 Magnatone, Mark III, 1960AX, homebrew 2x12 (C90 / EVM12L Thiele), HX Stomp, JCA50H
  • PLX GABion, SD-1, TS9, Crybaby, MXR108, Algal clone, Carbon Copy deluxe

DIY

Ostinato Rubato wrote:"That's the second boomery bro on this forum I've helped seduce to the greenside." :evil:

"Slow and steady gets to **** again eventually" :fap:
User avatar
Markdude
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Markdude »

GRIMESPACE wrote:Awesome video. Amazing difference between various load boxes, for sure. Did I miss a part where he stated the actual load he used when playing back his recorded IR?


It was probably the Suhr Reactive Load, I believe that's the main one he uses and he's endorsed by Suhr.
Sinical
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:55 am

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Sinical »

I'm a big fan of IR's; no matter how hard I try, I simply cannot get as good of a sound with an SM57 as I do with just picking out my favorite Redwirez and doing it that way. Then again, I'm so shitty at miking that even my CabClone recordings sound better. :lol:
Ibanez and Warmoth guitars
Incoming custom Mesa BL50
Misc. stompboxes
User avatar
GuitarBilly
Chief Executive Owl
Posts: 48416
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:03 pm
Location: Rockville, MD
Contact:

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by GuitarBilly »

I am a huge fan or IRs. It makes a guitar player's life so much easier. But watching this video, it's an eye opener how much the actual load affects the tone. I have a fixed load and while I like the results I usually get, I am now wanting to get a reactive load.
Guitars:
'78 Les Paul Pro / '89 SG Special/ '04 Gibson Les Paul Classic 3 pickup / Jackson Star/ Endres Tele / Fernandes Rhoads/ ''74 Hohner MIJ strat/ 2 Partscasters

Amps:
Depends on when you ask. I got tired of constantly updating this section lol

Cabs
Marshall 1960A w V30s/ Seismic 2x12 w Redback and V30.


Questions about the forum: please PM here. Can't access the forum? Need a password reset? Please access our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/GuitarGearForumOfficial and message me through it.
User avatar
Ostinato Rubato
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 35812
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:14 pm
Location: Fruitville, TX

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Ostinato Rubato »

I wonder how the IRT handles it's loading :hmm:
EBMM Stingray Tobacco and Tort
Marshall 2555X Jubilee
Marshall 2536 2x12
CS Deja Vibe mkii > SupaTrem Jr. > Xotic Wah > OCD v2.0 > Fulldrive 2 mkii > TB Jailed Pitchblack > (Alter Ego x4)
VTM
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 15536
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by VTM »

Modest wrote:I wonder how the IRT handles it's loading :hmm:


I was looking at the IRT specs and wondering that too.

:hmm:
Cameron Amps wrote:He's right....I think VTMs sound great....go get one. No nos tubes needed.

TurboPablo wrote:Scribble strips are for kids.
VTM
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 15536
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by VTM »

Markdude wrote:
GRIMESPACE wrote:Awesome video. Amazing difference between various load boxes, for sure. Did I miss a part where he stated the actual load he used when playing back his recorded IR?


It was probably the Suhr Reactive Load, I believe that's the main one he uses and he's endorsed by Suhr.


The Suhr Reactive Load is $400 and you don't have to use a cab for that one. The Suhr box he used in the vid is also reactive but needs to have an actual cab connected to it.

At least that's how I understand it.

:idk:
Cameron Amps wrote:He's right....I think VTMs sound great....go get one. No nos tubes needed.

TurboPablo wrote:Scribble strips are for kids.
User avatar
Markdude
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Markdude »

Slobber Rod wrote:
Markdude wrote:
GRIMESPACE wrote:Awesome video. Amazing difference between various load boxes, for sure. Did I miss a part where he stated the actual load he used when playing back his recorded IR?


It was probably the Suhr Reactive Load, I believe that's the main one he uses and he's endorsed by Suhr.


The Suhr Reactive Load is $400 and you don't have to use a cab for that one. The Suhr box he used in the vid is also reactive but needs to have an actual cab connected to it.

At least that's how I understand it.

:idk:


He was using the Suhr ISO Line Out box at one point when he was showing how the IR sounds while the amp is still connected to a 'real' load (by having it connected to the cab, but grabbing the signal with the Suhr ISO Line Out). But for an actual load box, he uses the Suhr Reactive Load in a bunch of vids and he seems to favor it. The ISO Line Out is neither resistive nor reactive since it's not absorbing any of the load.
User avatar
lester
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:29 am

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by lester »

He didn't demonstrate the Palmer PDI-03 reactive load, which I read somewhere resembles the impedance curve of a V30, verses the Suhr's greenback approach. I'd be curious how the Palmer stacks up as well.

*edit - someone posted this in the thread over there. Adjustable impedance curve and switchable input impedance. Looks kinda cool, bit more money though.

http://amtelectronics.com/new/amt-power-eater-120/


,
Last edited by lester on Tue Oct 13, 2015 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
VTM
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 15536
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by VTM »

Markdude wrote:
Slobber Rod wrote:
Markdude wrote:
GRIMESPACE wrote:Awesome video. Amazing difference between various load boxes, for sure. Did I miss a part where he stated the actual load he used when playing back his recorded IR?


It was probably the Suhr Reactive Load, I believe that's the main one he uses and he's endorsed by Suhr.


The Suhr Reactive Load is $400 and you don't have to use a cab for that one. The Suhr box he used in the vid is also reactive but needs to have an actual cab connected to it.

At least that's how I understand it.

:idk:


He was using the Suhr ISO Line Out box at one point when he was showing how the IR sounds while the amp is still connected to a 'real' load (by having it connected to the cab, but grabbing the signal with the Suhr ISO Line Out). But for an actual load box, he uses the Suhr Reactive Load in a bunch of vids and he seems to favor it. The ISO Line Out is neither resistive nor reactive since it's not absorbing any of the load.


Thanks for the clarification.

:thu:
Cameron Amps wrote:He's right....I think VTMs sound great....go get one. No nos tubes needed.

TurboPablo wrote:Scribble strips are for kids.
User avatar
'63-Strat
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:56 am
Location: SoCal

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by '63-Strat »

This suhr reactive load definitely has me interested. I kinda wish it also worked as an attenuator for live use if necessary but I realize that's not its intent.
User avatar
Nateispro
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 1648
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:05 pm

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Nateispro »

'63-Strat wrote:This suhr reactive load definitely has me interested. I kinda wish it also worked as an attenuator for live use if necessary but I realize that's not its intent.


I'm really wanting one of those or the fryette powerstation and buy some good IR's cause it's too hard to mic my Science Decolonizer and be able to hear whatever backing track or recording im playing with :lol:
Kiesel DC800
Ibanez RGD 7 Iron Label
79 Ibanez St-50
80 Ibanez Destroyer II
Kemper
Good deals: Shane159, Bloodnail, Steinmetzify, Madryan, Diocide, Madenotez
User avatar
Dickarms
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 14084
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Austin TX

Re: Cool Pete Thorn vid about load boxes and IRs

Post by Dickarms »

dat torpedo yo
also had no idea how capable the power station was til i just went to their page
Beer==>SG==>Pedals==>Orange TV50
Telephant wrote:C'mon down to Marshall town sweet tits. We're all having a helluva time. :cop:

ovid9 wrote:But, having three cats, I don't want to hurt their ears.

sleewell wrote:goop forever, thug life till I die bitch.

Dave Lister wrote:Ya'll motherfuckers don't need any or more better gear, ya'll need better ideas.

Good Deals: TU BE, Steveijobzz, MikeO, Pamuk Party, Heath
Post Reply