Page 1 of 2
NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2023 4:41 pm
by NinjaRaf
Re: NAD
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2023 6:36 pm
by Lance-a-not
Sounds absofuckinglutely killer Man!
I really like the Mirror IR personally, but they all sound great.
The Uber is one of my favorite modules, to me it sounds better than the amp by far

Re: NAD
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2023 6:51 pm
by NinjaRaf
Lance-a-not wrote:Sounds absofuckinglutely killer Man!
I really like the Mirror IR personally, but they all sound great.
The Uber is one of my favorite modules, to me it sounds better than the amp by far

Thanks dude! I super dig it so far! Funny, Bill said the exact same thing to me, which is what pushed me over the edge.
Re: NAD
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2023 7:32 pm
by Lance-a-not
Try the Cathode switch on the module too... It definitely makes a difference and some folks never
mess with it.

Re: NAD
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2023 7:58 pm
by NinjaRaf
I didn’t even know that was a thing!!
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 8:02 am
by Devin
Buddy of mine has this one and I got to jam thru it over the weekend; pretty dope indeed
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 9:24 am
by bubbastain
That Uber module sounds bad ass. That one is a possibility for me down the road I think.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 11:01 am
by eyeball987
Sounds great! Still need to try the Uber mod. From what I have tried so far, I could get along just fine with the SLO, Vai, and Deliverance modules. The Vai because of the extra versatility having the clean channel, the SLO is hands down my favorite, and the Deliverance is versatile with just enough of a different voice from the SLO. Still keeping the 6505 too though.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 11:15 am
by Dave
It does sound really good, but then you switched over to the Mrak and I liked it significantly more
Goddamn that Mrak sounds bad ass!
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 11:29 am
by Shask
That sounds great to me also! I assume the feel is there also.
Looks like I am going to go down the rabbit hole also, lol.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 1:59 pm
by BroSlinger
Dammit. I've been wanting the Uber mod so badly. It's the last thing I need right now. I should get a SYN2 before I get any more modules.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 6:21 pm
by NinjaRaf
Yeah the feel is definitely there. Feels awesome to play. I absolutely fucking love it!! It sounds incredible. And it’s a different flavor from the Mesa without too much money. But the ground loop thing is pretty annoying. It’s even worse with the peters. So I’m definitely gonna need to get either a power amp or maybe the 30 watt head. It’s about the same size as the Mesa, so I’m kinda leaning toward that. But it sounds so ridiculous through the Mesa power section that I have been thinking….what if I get a Mesa 290 lol.
No doubt the Mesa is a different level of amp haha.
Anyway, not sure what I will end up going with. For now, the isp is really good. Though it does impart some of that SS sound to it, which while cool is not what I’m after.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 6:24 pm
by GuitarBilly
NinjaRaf wrote:Yeah the feel is definitely there. Feels awesome to play. I absolutely fucking love it!! It sounds incredible. And it’s a different flavor from the Mesa without too much money. But the ground loop thing is pretty annoying. It’s even worse with the peters. So I’m definitely gonna need to get either a power amp or maybe the 30 watt head. It’s about the same size as the Mesa, so I’m kinda leaning toward that. But it sounds so ridiculous through the Mesa power section that I have been thinking….what if I get a Mesa 290 lol.
No doubt the Mesa is a different level of amp haha.
Anyway, not sure what I will end up going with. For now, the isp is really good. Though it does impart some of that SS sound to it, which while cool is not what I’m after.
Try to cut the ground off of one of the cables. Maybe the one going into the head's fx return.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 6:26 pm
by GuitarBilly
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 7:12 pm
by Mike Oxhuge
These have a ground lift button in back. Try this first.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 7:38 pm
by spawnofthesith
Congrats!! Sounds fucking awesome, I think I like it better through the ISP than the Mesa…
I agree with Dave tho, definitely think the Mark VII is hard to beat!! But both sound amazing
I could see them complimenting each other well blended together
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 7:43 pm
by NinjaRaf
Yeah I tried the ground lift button. No change. Gonna try a ground lift on a cable and see what that does.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 8:03 pm
by GuitarBilly
Do.
A.
Ground.
Lift.
On.
A.
Cable.
F.
F.
S.

Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 8:28 pm
by NinjaRaf
LoLoL. I’ve been doing the trick or treating thing, so haven’t had a chance yet.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 11:25 pm
by Telephant
I agree with your conclusion, they both sound really gat damn good!

Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:24 am
by JiveTurkey
This sounds GREAT \m/ That Uber module is something else.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2023 10:50 am
by NinjaRaf
Looks like removing a ground from one of the cables solved the excessive noise. Now it's just regular high gain noise lol.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:39 am
by Telephant
Cole is actually sending me a female to male quarter inch adapter to plug one of my FX loop cables into. Why an adapter you ask? Cause I ain’t breaking the ground on a cable in my new loom gat damn it.

Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:56 am
by NinjaRaf

I have so many random cables from Hosa and Planet Waves that I don't mind doing it to one of them. But it definitely makes it less important to grab another power option, now. We'll see lol.
Re: NAD Synergy Uberschall
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2023 12:29 pm
by GuitarBilly
Telephant wrote:Cole is actually sending me a female to male quarter inch adapter to plug one of my FX loop cables into. Why an adapter you ask? Cause I ain’t breaking the ground on a cable in my new loom gat damn it.

Assuming you're talking about a multi-channel cable loom, I like to connect the loom to a junction box. Not only it makes the layout cleaner, since all channels come out of the same place, but it also make it easy to do ground lifts on the patch cables going to the pedals, without touching the loom.
This my current board:

The box labeled "RSI" is my junction box and the loom plugs in there. Then I have patch cables going to the pedals. (RSI is Return, Send, Input, which is where each channel of the loom goes).