Page 1 of 1

Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:35 pm
by Iceman
After watcthing this video

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiViRLn_3HQ[/video]

I decided it would be more convenient to have a JC-90. I live an apartment with stairs and would hate to lug a 60 lbs amp around. I want to use one of those old rockman Distortion Generators in the JC-90's effects loop and have a simple lightweight rig for gigs. The only thing I am worried about are the 2X10 vs 2X12 speakers and the lack of bass with smaller speakers. JC-90s are hard to find so I cant test it out in person. Anybody have any experience with a JC-90 or JC-77 (very similar to JC-90 except no effects loop and no silver cone speakers)?

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:54 pm
by Iceman
Nobody?

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:23 pm
by jimSG
Nope, no experience with a JC-90. And really I'm just familiar with the JC-120 from listening, never playing.

Anyway...does your music need huge low end? You didn't mention your style. I always liked the Fender Vibrolux Reverb or whatever that 2x10 amp that is similar to the Deluxe Reverb is called. But I don't really need a lot of low end out of my guitar.

I guess this is just a free bump for you...

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:35 pm
by wyatt
10" speakers can have plenty of punchy low-end, it's usually midrange they lack.

If you want the best chorus, it's soticebaly better and more spacial out of the stereo JC-120. The dry signal goes to one speaker and the delayed signal goes to the other, it's when the soundwaves mix in the air that the chorus effect is created. With the 77 and 90, the signals are mixed internally as part of the preamp.

You may find the Distorion Generator a bit processed sounding into the rather "flat" voice JC.

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:37 pm
by Iceman
Thanks guys. My music is kind of like 80's new wave meets 80's hard rock. It goes from Cure like clean to thats 80s Def Leppard rock sound. I had a Rockman Sustainor into a JC-120, but the Sustainor was old and hissy. It needed a refurb, if it was newer it would have been perfect

My music
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... dID=282913

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:00 am
by RaceU4her
i never knew there was a jc90

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:18 am
by NaturalBornBoy
I once gigged for quite a while with a ToneBone Hot British into a JC120. Fucking sweet as fuck tone!

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:53 am
by Sasquatch
Jc120s are awesome fucking amps. I would love to have one and use pedals. The chorus has to be heard in person to appreciate it; it is incredible!!! Never played a 90.

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:47 am
by jimSG
RaceU4her wrote:i never knew there was a jc90

Same here. Not that I have ever played through the JC-120, but at least I know about them (and they do sound great). Wyatt's informative post on the differences makes me wonder if the JC-120 can be a pain to mic. I hate messing around with two mics on the same amp. I really didn't know how the chorus effect was produced.

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:51 am
by benjamin801
wyatt wrote:10" speakers can have plenty of punchy low-end, it's usually midrange they lack.


This. Consider that 10" speakers are the most popular size for...bass cabs. :thu:

Re: Thinking of buying a JC-90 vs a JC-120

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:07 am
by ke2
I heard a Damage Control Solid Metal through a JC-160 once (4x10, I believe)
Loud as fuck, metal as fuck :D