Page 2 of 2
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:58 am
by soundgardener75
Voted for 20. Pain in the ass for epic threads if it's more than 20 pages.
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:17 am
by Diocide
Mesa/Kramer wrote:Steveijobzz wrote:Anything over 20 would make the spam thread practically unloadable. 50 posts with GIANT ASS IMAGES.
I vote 20.
Plus epic threads look more epic when they have larger page counts.
This and the GIF thread might take all day to load 1 page..........................
izzy wrote:Steveijobzz wrote:...50 posts with GIANT ASS IMAGES...
Image sizes can be limited in most forum software, and I recommend it. 1024px should be adequate / appease all.
If it does end up being 50, can we make sure this happens? I hate when I feel like I'm back on dial up because someone posts pics the size of google earth of their crap...
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:29 am
by Zozobra
50/100 posts of gifs would make my internet cry
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:34 am
by xfkx
~Abstract~ wrote:The ONLY options are 20, 50 and 100?
:cop:
yeah, why not add 3, 37 and 72,5
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:36 am
by OverDriven
I would say it doesn't really matter at all. Can't you change it in personal preferences?
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:37 am
by clipless bumper
no - it's a global setting here.
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:57 am
by Dickarms
i really dont know which id be comfortable with, so yall decide and i can talk shit about the decision later
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:10 am
by cibyl
37 - I like a good prime number.
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:21 pm
by ~Abstract~
xfkx wrote:~Abstract~ wrote:The ONLY options are 20, 50 and 100?
:cop:
yeah, why not add 3, 37 and 72,5
I'd choose 200 if that were an option...like at Openjam.
If people are just choosing what's in the "middle", then an option for 200 may make a difference.
Why not an option for 10? Like the old default at HC?
More options are always better. Unless you're a communist. Are you a communist?
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:29 pm
by ~Abstract~
cibyl wrote:37 - I like a good prime number.
Me too. 97 perhaps?
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:13 pm
by Gunslinger
The answer is 42
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:32 pm
by Noizemaker
I would personally prefer 40.
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:05 pm
by 100 watt
10 inches
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:12 pm
by magh8
50 is cool
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:22 pm
by SouthpawGuy
50 for me is good
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:40 pm
by ~Abstract~
whur my fitty iz?
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:01 am
by xfkx
~Abstract~ wrote:xfkx wrote:~Abstract~ wrote:The ONLY options are 20, 50 and 100?
:cop:
yeah, why not add 3, 37 and 72,5
I'd choose 200 if that were an option...like at Openjam.
If people are just choosing what's in the "middle", then an option for 200 may make a difference.
Why not an option for 10? Like the old default at HC?
More options are always better. Unless you're a communist. Are you a communist?
Well yeah, if it was to be set for each user individually than sure, but let's be fair and say that 100 posts per page is already stretching it for most users, and yes - I am a communist
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:20 am
by Elessar [Sly]
I am quite happy with what it is now.
Re: Posts per page
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:00 pm
by GuitarBilly
50 it is.