Guitar Gear Forum

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 2:49 pm**

duncan wrote:

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

Kids are people too.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 2:50 pm**

soulsurfer wrote:where can a child buy a gun?

The dude with the trench coat.

The thread title has made me hungry.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 2:55 pm**

poor baby. this is very, very sad.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 2:57 pm**

KCTigerChief wrote:That picture is probably more accurate than you think.

Um, it's dead accurate. That's the actual pic of the family home from the news article.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 3:13 pm**

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 3:28 pm**

Bardagh wrote:This company's website has been taken down, so I can't go and see how they actually marketed the rifle,

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 3:31 pm**

They better hire an intellectual property lawyer. That second one looks very much like a Zoot Suit Gibson.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 3:42 pm**

KCTigerChief wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

A 22 is not built for children...If you really think that, please do the world a favor and get rid of your gun.

Learn to read, nub.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:26 pm**

exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

Reason folks; this is what a post filled with it looks like.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:34 pm**

duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:35 pm**

duncan wrote:
Marc G wrote:to be fair... you could have at least put a pic or two... oh wait... it's Duncan.. carry on...

Here's where that family lives:

As you can see, this family should definitely be spending their money on guns built for children.

There is a fucking tire ON THE ROOF!!

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:40 pm**

marshallnoise wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

You're right. The damned panty-related deaths in this country is getting out of hand.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:49 pm**

phrophus wrote:
You're right. The damned panty-related deaths in this country is getting out of hand.

QFT

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:52 pm**

phrophus wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

You're right. The damned panty-related deaths in this country is getting out of hand.

Lindsay Lohan's panties killed 32 people last week.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:54 pm**

benjamin801 wrote:
phrophus wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

You're right. The damned panty-related deaths in this country is getting out of hand.

Lindsay Lohan's panties killed 32 people last week.

Lindsey Lohan's panties didn't kill those people. The diseases seeping into those panties killed those people.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:56 pm**

phrophus wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

You're right. The damned panty-related deaths in this country is getting out of hand.

I compared a moral choice (guns for kids) to another moral choice ("sexy" underwear for 11 year olds). Kids killing kids with guns designed for use by kids that kids can't buy without an adult buying for them is not an epidemic.

Good try.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:59 pm**

marshallnoise wrote:
phrophus wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

You're right. The damned panty-related deaths in this country is getting out of hand.

I compared a moral choice (guns for kids) to another moral choice ("sexy" underwear for 11 year olds). Kids killing kids with guns designed for use by kids that kids can't buy without an adult buying for them is not an epidemic.

Good try.

You should try not thinking about 11-year old girls' underwear so much. Doesn't bode well for your future.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 5:10 pm**

Well, this thread seems to have taken a violent turn into the derp. Thanks for that marshallnoise.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 5:27 pm**

You can always count on mrashlal "libertarian" noise to head for the rhetorical gutter.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 5:36 pm**

mother fucking piece of mother fucking shit

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 5:58 pm**

phrophus wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:
phrophus wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

You're right. The damned panty-related deaths in this country is getting out of hand.

I compared a moral choice (guns for kids) to another moral choice ("sexy" underwear for 11 year olds). Kids killing kids with guns designed for use by kids that kids can't buy without an adult buying for them is not an epidemic.

Good try.

You should try not thinking about 11-year old girls' underwear so much. Doesn't bode well for your future.

Nice.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 6:03 pm**

I love this thread.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 7:08 pm**

duncan wrote:Well, this thread seems to have taken a violent turn into the derp. Thanks for that marshallnoise.

Axe wrote:You can always count on mrashlal "libertarian" noise to head for the rhetorical gutter.

Ah, like clockwork.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 7:14 pm**

Rather than the "tween" undies comparison, this is a lot more like those Marlboro Little Smokies that are targeted at pre-teen kids. What's that? Such a thing doesn't exist because it would be stupid and horribly inappropriate? Exactly.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 7:21 pm**

marshallnoise wrote:
duncan wrote:
KCTigerChief wrote:
exafro wrote:I can understand a kid having a gun, but letting one have unfettered access to it is a horrible idea. You have to keep it locked up and only allow supervised use.

I had a BB gun as a kid, but was only allowed to use it with my parents around until I was a bit older. Like you, I can see a kid (NOT 5 years old) having a 22, as long as it's locked up, and only used when the parents are around. Lots of my friends used to hunt squirrels and shit with their dads and they used 22s. It's more about parenting, than anything else here...

You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed to children?

I can see this thread headed to the Hot Button Issues forum in about 3...2...1...

That said, a gun can't be marketed to a child because a child can't buy it.

What you mean to say is this: "You see nothing wrong with guns built for and marketed for kids use?"

To which I respond: No, nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Victoria's Secret coming out with underwear for "tweens?" They can buy it, unfettered and uninhibited.

Kids typically can't buy a Leapfrog or Xbox 360 either, but they're marketed to kids so that they pester the fuck out of their parents to buy them. Combine that with the white trash fuckers in the OP and you've got a recipe for disaster. And, before anyone starts, yes, I have several firearms in my house. I've had most of them for 25 years. Raised three kids with them in my house. Never an incident because they knew better.

FWIW, I've never seen a "tweens" underpants kill another tween by accidentally flying out of a panty drawer. Take that shit to your pastor.

Guitar Gear Forum

:facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ

Re: :facepalm: WTFBBQ